BioE 6100E 3GG (3679): Ecology Disrupted: Sustainability and human environmental impact
Course Description:
This course is rooted in the evolutionary-ecological land ethic espoused eighty years ago by pre-eminent wildlife ecologist, Aldo Leopold. Leopold understood the “land” as a system of interacting living and non-living parts. He saw the system components as important for the interactions they have with one another. Additionally, he saw each living component as a valuable record of its past. To Leopold, an organism’s life history, appearance, and even its surroundings were all evidence of the remarkable fact of its evolution. Leopold’s recognition that each organism and ecosystem has an evolutionary history provides a roadmap for interpreting human impact on species and ecological interactions through an evolutionary lens. Leopold understood human impact on ecology as a disruption of evolution. This interpretation of human impact as an evolutionary disruption of ecological function tightly links these areas into one topic, ecology disrupted.
We will use this Ecology Disrupted method to bring Leopold’s evolutionary-ecological perspective to each topic studied in this course. The goal of this approach is to learn about the importance and complexity of normal ecological function, by studying the environmental issues that result when people disrupt them. This model uses the same intellectual approach that the field of genetics uses to understand gene function. Simply put, geneticists learn gene function by studying the phenotypes that result from mutations that disrupt normal gene function. In this model, you will learn the complexity of functioning ecosystems by studying the environmental issues that result from human actions that disrupt normal ecological function. Studying ecological disruption will unlock the complexity that connects everyday human actions to environmental issues and will show the important role that ecology plays in daily life. Framing this course as an exploration of how people disrupt evolutionary systems, will help focus on the human connections to ecosystems and how to alter behaviors and policies in order to live sustainably.
Schedule: Thursdays: 4:50pm-7:20pm
Room: TBA
Instructor: Professor Yael Wyner (Visser)
Office: NAC 5/205c
Email: y%77y%6eer@ccny.cuny.edu " rel="nofollow"> ywyner@ccny.cuny.edu
Phone: 212-650-5869
Office Hours: Thursday, 3pm-4pm and by appointment.
Policy on Academic Integrity:
Under the CUNY Student Academic Integrity Policy (web.cuny.edu/academics/info-central/policies/academic-integrity.pdf) “Academic Dishonesty is prohibited in The City University of New York and is punishable by penalties, including failing grades, suspension, and expulsion, as provided herein.” Violations of this policy fall into these areas that include but are not limited to:
- Cheating
- Obtaining Unfair Advantage
- Falsifying of Records and Official Documents
- Plagiarizing
Here are more details on plagiarism from the CUNY academic integrity policy:
Plagiarism is the act of presenting another person’s ideas, research or writings as your own.
The following are some examples of plagiarism, but by no means is it an exhaustive list:
• Copying another person’s actual words without the use of quotation marks and footnotes attributing the words to their source.
• Presenting another person’s ideas or theories in your own words without acknowledging the source.
• Using information that is not common knowledge without acknowledging the source.
• Failing to acknowledge collaborators on homework and laboratory assignments.
Internet plagiarism includes submitting downloaded term papers or parts of term papers, paraphrasing or copying information from the internet without citing the source, and “cutting & pasting” from various sources without proper attribution.
I welcome any questions you may have concerning academic integrity and will do my best to help you understand the standards of academic scholarship. I use CUNY guidelines to sanction any incidents of academic dishonesty in my courses. Any student who violates this policy will FAIL the course.
Reading: A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There by Aldo Leopold. Additional readings will be distributed throughout the course and are listed in the class schedule. Make sure that you check blackboard for reading assignments.
Blackboard: All students must use CUNY electronic blackboard. It is assumed that you will check Blackboard for all assignments and announcements. Blackboard includes a feature that automatically sends announcements via email, please make sure that you login to your CCNY account to check email.
Course Requirements:
Active participation; consistent and timely attendance
Weekly reading of assignments
Timely completion of all required work
Attendance, punctuality, and participation
Attendance is required. This course includes discussion and activities, so "getting notes from a friend" will not replicate the learning experience of a missed session. If you miss, for whatever reason, more than three sessions, you will be withdrawn from the course. The expectation is that you will be present, on time, and prepared for every class. Just as any professional teacher does in school, please contact me if you will not be present in class due to any special circumstances or an emergency. Those who are more than 10 minutes late to class will be counted as late. Three late marks will count as an absence. Consult the CCNY academic calendar when planning vacations or travel.
Candidates are expected to come to class prepared. This entails reading all the assigned materials before class and completing all the assigned activities (when applicable). Active participation and engagement in class discussions and activities are always expected.
Studentship
Studentship is your eagerness to learn, reflected in a positive, searching attitude and in your full, purposeful, and meaningful participation in coursework and class discussions. Studentship necessitates your taking responsibility for your educational experience. You will be evaluated based on your preparedness, your willingness to participate in activities and discussions in a reflective and professional manner, and your ability to ask questions that represent thoughtful reflection on the material presented and the readings. It is insufficient to merely read the assigned materials and complete the activities. You are expected to think deeply about the pedagogy embedded in them. Good teachers must also be good colleagues. Thus, you will also be assessed on how well you work with others. See the rubric below that will be used to assess this criterion.
Grading:
- Participation: 20%
- Assignments: 40%
-
- Reading and analysis of writings of Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold Due 2/6 (15%)
- Newspaper Article Summary and Analysis Due Thursday, 2/13 (15%)
- Do 2: Reflection on “Prairie Birthday,” “January,” “November,” “Marshland Elegy.” (10%)
- Ecology Disrupted Project: 30%
-
- Reflection on the Ecology Disrupted Approach – Due 3/12
- Revised Reflection on the Ecology Disrupted Approach – Due 3/26 (10%)
- Draft of Ecology Disrupted Project due 4/23 (Every day late 1 point will be deducted from final project grade and will miss out on in-class feedback before final project is due)
- Final Project & Presentation of Final Version of Ecology Disrupted Project due 5/7 (20% of grade)
- Reflection on your completed and other people’s Ecology Disrupted Final Projects: Due 5/14 (10%)
Date |
Topic |
Reading (due on date listed for row) |
1/30 |
Science and Sustainability
What is Natural?
Contextualizing people in the Earth’s systems
|
|
2/6 |
The Land Ethic: Contextualizing ecology into our daily lives
|
Gifford Pinchot: “The Conservation of Natural Resources”
John Muir: “Our National Parks”
Aldo Leopold: “The Land Ethic” in A Sand County Almanac
Assignment I: Analysis of Readings Due
|
2/13 |
Newspaper summary, article analysis and discussion |
Assignment II: Newspaper Article Summary Due |
2/20 |
Evolution and Biodiversity
The intersection of humanity and ecosystems as products of natural selection
The 6th mass extinction: Humanity’s defeat of natural selection
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., ... & Ferrer, E. A. (2011). Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature, 471(7336), 51-57. Assignment of Ecology Disrupted Final Project
|
“Prairie Birthday” from A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold.
Evolution: Understanding Evolution https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_01
Biodiversity: http://yourwildlife.org/2015/04/could-there-be-200-million-species-on-earth/ |
2/27 |
Earth Processes: Continental drift, subsidence, erosion
Disruptions: Invasive species, flooding in New Orleans and the Jersey Shore, mountain-top removal mining
|
https://www.livescience.com/37706-what-is-plate-tectonics.html
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/erosion/
|
3/5 |
Energy Flow and Our Food Supply
The transfer of energy between trophic levels and its impact on the food we eat and bioaccumulation
Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., Milo, R. (2014). Environmental costs of animal-based categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (33) 11996-12001; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402183111
Mercury pollution in one of the world’s most isolated places |
“January” from A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold.
Energy Economics in Ecosystems: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/energy-economics-in-ecosystems-13254442
Energy Flow in Ecosystems https://www.learner.org/courses/envsci/unit/text.php?unit=4&secNum=3
The Importance of Forage Fish https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2013/09/25/forage-fish-faq
|
3/12 |
Ecosystem Fundamentals
Community Interactions & Food Webs
Human disruption of community interactions in ecosystems
Jackson, et al. (2001) Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems
Kavanagh, C. (2016) 2015 Florida Bay Seagrass Die-Off. National Park Service. South Florida Natural Resources Center: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316554225_2015_Florida_Bay_Seagrass_Die-Off
In class work session for Ecology Disrupted Reflections
|
“November” from A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold.
Food Webs: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/food-web-concept-and-applications-84077181
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stability: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/biodiversity-and-ecosystem-stability-17059965
Community Ecology: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/characterizing-communities-13241173
Due Draft Reflection on Ecology Disrupted Approach
|
3/19 |
The flow of water, nitrogen, and carbon through terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems Part 1
Human disruption of the movement of water between the atmosphere, land, and water bodies. Evaporation: Urban heat island Condensation: Aerosols and water movement Precipitation: Rainfall levels Surface runoff: impervious surfaces, algal blooms Infiltration: fertilizers Oceanic water circulation: Movement of plastic
Are We Dense About Development? The Costs and Benefits of High-Density Living.
Putnam, A., (2017). Human-induced changes in the distribution of rainfall. Science Advances 3, no. 5: e1600871.
|
Water Cycle: https://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercyclesummary.html https://www.whoi.edu/know-your-ocean/ocean-topics/climate-ocean/water-cycle/
|
3/26 |
The flow of water, nitrogen, and carbon through terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems Part 2
The nitrogen cycle and the food we eat: The interplay of our food production system with nitrogen in the land and water
Liang et. al,. (2016). Beef and coal are key drivers of Australia’s high nitrogen footprint. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-8.
|
Nitrogen Cycle:
Marshland Elegy from A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold. (pg 95-101)
Due Revised Reflection of Ecology Disrupted Topic
|
4/2 |
The flow of water, nitrogen, and carbon through terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems Part 3
The carbon cycle and ocean acidification and climate change
Household Carbon Footprints
|
Carbon Cycle: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/CarbonCycle/
|
4/9 |
Spring Break |
|
4/16 |
Spring Break |
|
4/23 |
Biomes & Climate
The Hazards of Development: Linking Climate Change and Patterns of Natural Disasters
From sink to source: The role of climate and pine beetles in forest transformation
Animal and Plant Migrations
In class work session for Ecology Disrupted Projects |
Basic Drivers of Climate:
Terrestrial Biomes: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/terrestrial-biomes-13236757
Aquatic Biomes: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/gloss5/biome/aquatic.html
Drafts Due of Ecology Disrupted Data Analysis
|
4/30 |
Climate Change: Evidence and Biological Impacts
|
IPCC Summary Report for Policy Makers: Go to this link for pdf: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf
|
5/7 |
Presentations |
Final Project and Presentation Due
|
5/14 |
Reflection on Presentations
|
Reflection on Final Project Due
|
Attendance, Punctuality, Participation, and Studentship Assessment Rubric
CRITERIA |
UNACCEPTABLE (1 point) |
ACCEPTABLE (2 points) |
TARGET (3 points) |
Attendance |
Missed 3 classes or more |
Missed no more than 2 classes |
Missed no more than 1 class |
Preparedness (completion of reading and written assignments) |
Sometimes prepared for class |
Usually prepared for class |
Always prepared for class |
Reflective contributions to discussions |
Contributions were sporadic, negative or disruptive |
Made some contributions to class discussions on a regular basis |
Contributed in a positive manner to class discussions on a regular basis |
Full participation in class assignments and activities |
Took little interest in class activities |
Participated in class activities |
Enthusiastically participated in class activities |
Collegiality |
Disrespectful to others or did not support the work of others |
Respectful of the ideas of others and supported the work of others |
Respectful of the ideas of others, encouraged others to participate, and supported the work of others |
Assignments in Detail:
-
- Reading and analysis of writings of Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold Due 2/6 (15%)
- Read over the articles by Pinchot, Muir, and Leopold.
- Summarize the major themes of each author. Include relevant quotes and statements from each author to support each theme summary.
- How are they similar in their emphasis? How are they different in their emphasis?
- How are the viewpoints of each author relevant today? Identify the relevant viewpoint and explain the way it informs how society deals with environmental issues today.
- How are their viewpoints dated? Describe the perspectives of each writer that feels outmoded and explain why it feels like it is from another time.
- Are there any viewpoints that you haven’t considered before? Which viewpoint rings most true to you? Justify your response with examples.
- Reading and analysis of writings of Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold Due 2/6 (15%)
Note: Leopold is much more difficult to understand than the other two authors. Read him carefully.
|
Low (0-1 points) |
Mid- (2-3 points) |
High (4-5 points) |
Pinchot Summary (10%) |
Major themes are poorly described and supported by quotes and statements from the author. |
Some of the major themes are included and they are somewhat supported by quotes and statements from the author.
|
All major themes included and they are well supported by quotes and statements from the author. Well- written
|
Muir Summary (10%) |
Major themes are poorly described and supported by quotes and statements from the author. |
Some of the major themes are included and they are somewhat supported by quotes and statements from the author. |
All major themes included and they are well supported by quotes and statements from the author. Well- written |
Leopold Summary (20%) |
Major themes are poorly described and supported by quotes and statements from the author. |
Some of the major themes are included and they are somewhat supported by quotes and statements from the author.
|
All major themes included and they are well supported by quotes and statements from the author. Well- written
|
Author Similarities (15%) |
Poorly described and supported |
Adequately described and supported. |
Well-described and supported with examples. |
Author Differences (15%) |
Poorly described and supported |
Adequately described and supported. |
Well-described and supported with examples. |
Relevant today (10%) |
Poorly identifies viewpoints that are relevant to today and poorly explains how they inform the ways in which society deals with environmental issues today |
Identifies relevant viewpoints for most authors and explains how they inform the ways in which society deals with environmental issues today |
Clearly identifies relevant viewpoints for each author and explains with examples how they inform the ways in which society deals with environmental issues today. |
Outdated Viewpoints (10%)
|
Poorly describes the viewpoints that feel outmoded and does not justify why the viewpoints feel outmoded. |
Describes at least one viewpoint from each writer that feels outmoded and sometimes uses examples to explain why it feels like it is from another time. |
Clearly describes at least one viewpoint from each writer that feels outmoded and uses examples to explain why it feels like it is from another time. |
Viewpoints – new or interesting (10%)
|
Poorly describes the viewpoint that rings most true or that you haven’t considered before. |
Describes the viewpoint that rings most true or that you haven’t considered before. Justifies response with some reference to text.
|
Clearly describes the viewpoint or viewpoints that rings most true or that you haven’t considered before. Well-justified response with examples.
|
-
- Newspaper Article Summaries and Analysis Due 2/13.
Read your assigned articles and write a summary and an analysis of the hidden environmental connection for each article.
- Article summaries should be no longer than a few sentences.
- Most of assignment should be your analysis of the hidden environmental connections. What is the missing environmental story for each article? We will do one example in class as a way of demonstrating how to do this exercise.
For each article describe in detail:
-
- How people are impacting the environment. Include supporting evidence.
- How the environmental impact affects people and other life forms. Include supporting evidence.
Grading Rubric
|
Low (0-1 points) |
Mid- (2-3 points) |
High (4-5 points) |
Article Summary 1 (10%)
|
Summary is missing or incomprehensible. |
Adequately written summary with too little or too many points described.
|
Well-written summary with only salient points described. |
Description of how people are impacting the environment 1(20%) |
Poorly described and supported. |
Adequately described and supported with some supporting evidence. |
Thoughtfully described and well-supported with supporting evidence.
|
Description of how the environmental impact affects people and other life forms 1. (20%) |
Poorly described and supported. |
Adequately described and supported with some supporting evidence. |
Thoughtfully described and well-supported with supporting evidence.
|
Article Summary 2 (10%) |
Summary is missing or incomprehensible. |
Adequately written summary with too little or too many points described. |
Well-written summary with only salient points described. |
Description of how people are impacting the environment 2 (20%) |
Poorly described and supported. |
Adequately described and supported with some supporting evidence. |
Thoughtfully described and well-supported with supporting evidence.
|
Description of how the environmental impact affects people and other life forms 2 (20%) |
Poorly described and supported. |
Adequately described and supported with some supporting evidence. |
Thoughtfully described and well-supported with supporting evidence. |
Reflections on Ecology Disrupted in Detail: Define a focus area
-
-
-
- Draft Reflection of Ecology Disrupted Approach – Due 3/12 (small group feedback)
- Revised Reflection on the Ecology Disrupted Approach – Due 3/20 (10%)
-
-
Find data that elucidate an aspect of an environmental issue. You will use data to explore how an environmental issue interacts with an ecological function, daily life, and sustainability.
- Give an overview of the environmental issue
- How does it connect to an ecological principle?
- How does it connect to daily life?
- How does it connect to sustainability?
- Explain what the data show about the environmental issue. Include
- Context of study: Location, Date
- Experimental Design or Study Design
- Results & Claims
Use the rubric below as a guide.
Grading Rubric: (out of 25 points)
|
Low (0-1 points) |
Mid- (2-3 points) |
High (4-5 points) |
The overview of the environmental issue |
Poorly written & inadequate description of the environmental issue. |
Adequately written & somewhat thoughtful & complete description of the environmental issue.
|
Well-written, thoughtful, and complete description of the environmental issue.
|
How issue connects to an ecological principle |
Poorly written & inadequate description of how the environmental issue connects to an ecological principle. |
Adequately written & somewhat thoughtful & complete description of how the environmental issue connects to an ecological principle. |
Well-written, thoughtful, and complete description of how the environmental issue connects to an ecological principle.
|
How issue connects to daily life |
Poorly written & inadequate description of how the environmental issue connects to daily life. |
Adequately written & somewhat thoughtful & complete description of how the environmental issue connects to daily life. |
Well-written, thoughtful, and complete description of how the environmental issue connects to daily life. |
How issue connects to sustainability |
Poorly written & inadequate description of how the environmental issue connects to sustainability. |
Adequately written & somewhat thoughtful & complete description of how the environmental issue connects to sustainability. |
Well-written, thoughtful, and complete description of how the environmental issue connects to sustainability. |
Explanation of what the data indicate about the environmental issue |
Poorly written & inadequate description of what the data show about the environmental issue. Many not include some of these elements: Context of study, study design, and connects results to claims. |
Adequately written & somewhat thoughtful & complete description of what the data show about the environmental issue. Includes context of study, study design, and connects results to claims. |
Well-written, thoughtful, and complete description of what the data show about the environmental issue. Includes context of study, study design, and connects results to claims. |
2. Reflection on your completed and other student completed Ecology Disrupted assignments – Due 5/10 (10%)
Reflect upon:
- What role did data play in constructing understanding of your topic?
- How well do you think your environmental issue connected to daily life, ecological function, and sustainability? Did it connect to some topics better than others?
- Identify one element of each project that stood out for you: something you hadn’t thought about before, something that you can relate to, a particularly innovative or useful way of teaching? A table may be the best way to complete this part of the project.
- What did you learn from your project and from your classmates’ projects that you hadn’t really considered before? This can be new ways of thinking about ecology, sustainability, human impact or daily life or it can be new ways of formulating data or presenting ideas. What have you learned here that you will take to the classes you teach?
Grading Rubric:
|
Low (0-1 points) |
Mid- (2-3 points) |
High (4-5 points) |
What role did data play in constructing understanding of your topic? (15%)
|
Poorly written and thought-out reflection on the role of data in constructing understanding of your topic. |
Adequately written and thought-out reflection on the role of data in constructing understanding of your topic. An example included. |
Well-written and thought-out reflection on the role of data in constructing understanding of your topic. Specific examples described.
|
How well do you think your environmental issue connected to daily life, ecological function, and sustainability? Did it connect to some topics better than others? (15%) |
Poorly written and thought-out consideration of how you think your environmental issue is connected to daily life, ecological function, and sustainability. Lacks specificity and is incomplete. |
Adequately written and thought-out consideration of how you think your environmental issue is connected to daily life, ecological function, and sustainability. Is somewhat specific and complete. |
Well-written and thought-out consideration of how you think your environmental issue is connected to daily life, ecological function, and sustainability. Is specific and complete.
|
Identify one element of each project that stood out for you: something you hadn’t thought about before, that you can relate to, a particularly innovative or useful way of teaching? (30%) |
Poorly written and thought-out and incomplete reflection on one element of each project that stood out to you.
|
Adequately written and thought-out reflection on one element of each project that stood out to you. Uses examples for each
|
Well-written and thought-out reflection on one element of each project that stood out to you. Uses examples for each
|
What you’ve learned about sustainability daily life, ecology, human impact & formulating data or presenting ideas – What you will take to teaching? (15%) |
Poorly written and thought-out reflection on what you learned that you had not considered before. A discussion of what you will take with you to the classes you teach. |
Adequately written and thought-out reflection on what you learned that you had not considered before. An adequate discussion of what you will take with you to the classes you teach. |
Well-written and thought-out reflection on what you learned that you had not considered before. A thorough discussion of what you will take with you to the classes you teach. This discussion includes examples. |
Ecology Disrupted Project (20%):
- Draft of Ecology Disrupted Project due Thursday, 4/23
- Ecology Disrupted Project due 5/7 (20%)
Project Goals:
The goal of this project is to use data about an environmental issue from one scientific publication to link the environmental issue to its underlying ecological concept(s), daily life, and to some type of sustainable practice that can ameliorate the reported environmental issue. With these goals in mind, your lesson/unit should address these four topics:
Environmental Issue: Choose an environmental issue of interest and find data that help to understand this issue. Develop a worksheet that uses the data to understand the environmental issue. A good source of environmental issues is the AMNH Science Bulletin website; https://www.sciencedaily.com/ and https://www.eurekalert.org/.
Ecological Concept(s): Explicitly link the environmental issue to its appropriate ecological concepts. You can do so by asking questions that overlay an ecological framework on the related human action and environmental issue. Appropriate types of questions to consider are:
How is human action disrupting normal ecological function?
How does that disruption lead to an environmental issue?
This section asks you to reframe the discussion of the environmental issue into explicit ecological language. You will need to do research to develop appropriate answers to your questions.
For example, fish farming is a human action that leads to overfishing, which disrupts marine food webs (ecological principle). Fish farming can also be placed in the context of the nitrogen cycle, a different ecological principle. In this case, it disrupts the nitrogen cycle by artificially concentrating so many nutrients in one place.
Daily Life: Explicitly link the environmental issue to daily life. You can do so by asking questions that link daily life to the environmental issue. Appropriate types of questions to consider are: Why do we practice such environmentally damaging behavior? What aspects of daily life are helped by our practice? Why do people engage in environmentally destructive behavior? You will need to do research to develop appropriate answers to your questions.
For example, how do we benefit from farmed fish? If not obvious, do research to develop this idea. For example, people benefit from farmed salmon by being able to buy cheap fish. Document the consumption rates and the price of salmon today versus 20 years ago.
Sustainable Practice: Explicitly link the environmental issue to sustainability. You can do so by asking questions that link sustainability and daily life to the environmental issue. Appropriate types of questions to consider are: How can we change our behavior or alter our practice to reduce our ecological impact? What will be the ecological, economic, and societal repercussions of our change in practice? You will need to do research to develop appropriate answers to your questions.
For example: Can we eat less farmed fish? Can we farm different species? Can we develop different food sources for our farmed fish? How will these changes impact people’s livelihood?
Lesson Components:
For this activity you should develop student worksheets. You also need to include appropriate background information that will help interested teachers implement the lesson:
Items to Include:
-
-
- i.Title
- Appropriate Grade Levels
- iii.Objectives: What you want students to learn. What are your learning goals? Include learning goals about:
- Data analysis
- Environmental Issues
- Daily Life
- Ecology
- Sustainability
- iv.Prior Knowledge: The concepts and ideas with which students should be familiar
- Body of the Lesson: Instructions for lesson implementation
- vi.Handouts and Worksheets: Student versions
- Worksheets Should Contain Scaffolding questions that help student understanding:
- The study
- The data
- Claims based on data
- The environmental issue
- Worksheets Should Contain Scaffolding questions that help student understanding:
-
Presentation Components:
- Introduction which includes: Grade Level, Course, Environmental Issue, Daily Life, Ecological Concept, Sustainability and how you plan to connect ecology, daily life, and sustainability to the environmental issue. One Slide: SHORT
- Hand out worksheets and walk class thru them to explain:
- Study
- Data
- Claims based on data
- Environmental Issue
Grading Rubric for the Final Ecology Disrupted Project & Presentation due 5/7 (20%)
Criteria |
Low-performing (0-1 points) |
Mid-performing (2-3 points) |
High Performing (4-5 points) |
Title and Grade Level
Objectives
Prior Knowledge
Total (10%) |
Only title or grade level included. Title does not accurately describe lesson. |
Only title or grade level included. Title accurately describe lesson.
|
Both title and grade level are included. Title accurately describes lesson. |
Poorly explained, inaccurate, and barely match the goals of this project.
|
Fairly well explained, accurate, and mostly match the goals of this project. Only addresses some of the topic objectives.
|
Well-explained, accurate, & match the goals of this project. Easy to follow. Address ecology, environmental issues, daily life, sustainability & data analysis Objectives. Is specific. |
|
Poorly explained, inaccurate, and barely matches the chosen activity
Parts are poorly organized. |
Fairly well explained, accurate, and mostly matches the needs of the chosen activity Includes questions that somewhat effectively require students to think about prior knowledge.
Parts are somewhat organized are can be followed. |
Well-explained, accurate, & matches the needs of the activity. Includes questions that require students to think with prior knowledge, not just regurgitate.
All parts well organized and formatted, easy to follow. |
|
Data Analysis Worksheets
(55%) |
Instructions for data analysis are poorly communicated.
The activity design poorly facilitates learning about the specific details of the environmental issue.
There are few scaffolding questions.
|
Instructions for data analysis are fairly clear. The activity design somewhat facilitates learning about the specific details of the environmental issue. Includes appropriate scaffolding questions, but some questions are difficult to answer with the given information. The questions attempt to help student understanding of the study, the data, claims based on data & the environmental issue |
Instructions for data analysis are clear, easy to follow.
The activity design facilitates learning about the specific details of the environmental issue.
It includes appropriate scaffolding questions to help student data analysis and understanding of the study, the data, claims based on data & the environmental issue |
Ecological Concept, Daily Life, Sustainability Effectiveness (15%) |
The lesson does a poor job contributing to learning about how the ecological concept, daily life & sustainability relate to the environmental issue.
|
The lesson adequately contributes to learning about how the ecological concept, daily life & sustainability relate to the environmental issue. |
The lesson clearly and effectively contributes to learning about how the ecological concept, daily life & sustainability relate to the environmental issue. |
Presentation of data analysis worksheets
(20%) |
The presentation does not run smoothly & data not properly used to learn about a about a specific environmental issue and the introduction poorly explains how issue is connected to relevant ecological concepts, daily life and sustainability. |
The presentation runs fairly smoothly, stays close to allotted time & data are used to learn about a specific environmental issue and the introduction somewhat explains how issue is connected to relevant ecological concepts, daily life and sustainability. |
The presentation runs smoothly, stays within allotted time & data are used to learn about a specific environmental issue and the introduction explains how issue is connected to relevant ecological concepts, daily life and sustainability. |
Last Updated: 08/15/2022 13:54